Home / Textiles / Procedure Drapes and Sheets / Drape Sheets / EENT Drape / EENT Drape Thyroid Drape 100 W X 77 W X 121-1/2 L Inch Sterile29522
Picture of EENT Drape Thyroid Drape 100 W X 77 W X 121-1/2 L Inch Sterile29522

EENT Drape Thyroid Drape 100 W X 77 W X 121-1/2 L Inch Sterile29522

EENT-Drape-Thyroid-Drape-100-W-X-77-W-X-121-1-2-L-Inch-Sterile29522

SKU #

#269561

MPN #

29522

Brand

Cardinal

Stock

In Stock

Quantity

100

Features

DRAPE, THYROID W/ARMBOARD (12/CS) 29522C

$80.05 USD

Attribute Name Attribute Value
McKesson # 269561
Manufacturer # 29522
Manufacturer Cardinal
Application EENT Drape
Color Blue
Dimensions 100 W X 77 W X 121-1/2 L Inch
Drape Name Thyroid Drape
Extremity Cover Arm Covers, Gusseted
Fluid Collection Type Without Pouch
Instrument Holders Instrument Pad
Material Tiburon Fabric
Reinforcement Type Absorbent 25 X 25-1/2 Inch Reinforcement
Securing Method Adhesive Aperture
Sterility Sterile
Surgical Area Fenestrated
Surgical Area Specifications Diamond 5 X 5 Inch Fenestration
Tube and Cord Holders Cord and Tube Holders
UNSPSC Code 42131701

Similar Items

Underarm Crutches McKesson Aluminum Frame Tall Adult 350 lbs. Weight Capacity Push Button - Adjustment

One Size Fits Most White NonSterile Not Rated 8211

In Stock

PR/1 $9.76 USD

Underarm Crutches McKesson Aluminum Frame Tall Adult 350 lbs. Weight Capacity Push Button - Adjustment

One Size Fits Most White NonSterile Not Rated 8211

In Stock

PR/1 $9.76 USD

Underarm Crutches McKesson Aluminum Frame Tall Adult 350 lbs. Weight Capacity Push Button - Adjustment

One Size Fits Most White NonSterile Not Rated 8211

In Stock

PR/1 $9.76 USD

Underarm Crutches McKesson Aluminum Frame Tall Adult 350 lbs. Weight Capacity Push Button - Adjustment

One Size Fits Most White NonSterile Not Rated 8211

In Stock

PR/1 $9.76 USD

  • According the AORN’s 2003 Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines, surgical drapes “should be as lint free as possible", Tiburon® fabric is lower linting than other currently available surgical drape fabrics when compared in laboratory testing